Volume 29, Issue 1 (March 2025)                   Physiol Pharmacol 2025, 29(1): 84-95 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Almasian R, Jafari P, Farjanikish G, Noorbazargan H. In vivo study of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of metabiotic extracted from Lactobacillus acidophilus BF-P-064 in Ethanol-induced peptic ulcer. Physiol Pharmacol 2025; 29 (1) : 9
URL: http://ppj.phypha.ir/article-1-2322-en.html
Abstract:   (931 Views)

Introduction: Metabiotics are promising candidates for peptic ulcer (PU) healing by regulating the expression of pro-inflammatory genes and antioxidant capacity.

Methods: We prepared a metabiotic by culturing Lactobacillus acidophilus BF-P-064 and evaluated its cytotoxicity and antioxidant properties by MTT and DPPH (α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl) methods. To investigate the potential of PU healing, we divided 45 rats into 3 groups and induced PU by administering ethanol. The negative-control group was not treated, while the positive-control and metabiotic groups received treatment with a drug and a metabiotic. On different days, the wound area was determined and the histopathological characteristics were evaluated by H&E staining. The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, PDGF, VEGF, EGF, TGF-β, and TNF-α) and antioxidant (SOD and GPx) genes was assayed by qRT-PCR method.

Results: Our results showed that the metabiotic, at a concentration of 60 mg/mL, had no cytotoxic effects on the CaCo2 cell line, and its antioxidant capacity was 72.49 u/mL. The metabiotic caused faster wound contraction by accelerating the infiltration of phagocytic cells, which intensified the inflammatory phase. By increasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as enhancing antioxidant properties and the expression of SOD and GPx, the metabiotic prevented the induction of oxidative stress in the tissue. So, the proliferation phase started faster, and the healing process improved.

Conclusion: The metabiotic extracted from L. acidophilus BF-P-064 can improve the healing process of PU by increasing the antioxidant capacity, improving the pattern of cell infiltration, and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine

Article number: 9
Full-Text [PDF 697 kb]   (91 Downloads)    

References
1. An J-H, Li Q, Bhang D-H, Song W-J, Youn H-Y. TNF-α and INF-γ primed canine stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate experimental murine colitis. Scientific reports 2020; 10: 2115. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-58909-4]
2. Arian S, Kaboosi H, Heshmatipour Z, Koohpar Z K, Pyravii-Ghadikolaii F. Anti-proliferative effects of two new Lactobacillus strains of human origin on Caco-2 cell line. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2019; 21. [DOI:10.5812/ircmj.84683]
3. Assar D H, Elhabashi N, Mokhbatly A-A A, Ragab A E, Elbialy Z I, Rizk S A, et al. Wound healing potential of licorice extract in rat model: Antioxidants, histopathological, immunohistochemical and gene expression evidences. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2021; 143: 112151. [DOI:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112151]
4. Barrientos S, Stojadinovic O, Golinko M S, Brem H, Tomic-Canic M. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing. Wound repair and regeneration 2008; 16: 585-601. [DOI:10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x]
5. Bereda G. Peptic Ulcer disease: definition, pathophysiology, and treatment. Journal of Biomedical and Biological Sciences 2022; 1: 1-10.
6. Bharti V, Mehta A, Mourya G K, Ahirwal L. In vitro antioxidant potential of cell free supernatant of probiotic bacteria. FPI Journal 2017; 1: 187-193. [DOI:10.5530/fpi.1.4.4]
7. Biswas I, Mohapatra P K D. Recent advancement in metabiotics: A consortium with bioactive molecules after fermentation by probiotic bacteria with multidisciplinary application potential and future solution in health sector. Bioresource Technology Reports 2023: 101583. [DOI:10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101583]
8. Biswas I, Soren J P, Mohapatra P K D. Preparation of metabiotic curd and optimization of tannase and gallic acid production by probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum PKI15. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 2024: 103041. [DOI:10.1016/j.bcab.2024.103041]
9. Bousounis P, Bergo V, Trompouki E. Inflammation, aging and hematopoiesis: A complex relationship. Cells 2021; 10: 1386. [DOI:10.3390/cells10061386]
10. Bryan N, Ahswin H, Smart N, Bayon Y, Wohlert S, Hunt J A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-a family of fate deciding molecules pivotal in constructive inflammation and wound healing. Eur Cell Mater 2012; 24: e65. [DOI:10.22203/eCM.v024a18]
11. Cano Sanchez M, Lancel S, Boulanger E, Neviere R. Targeting oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in the treatment of impaired wound healing: a systematic review. Antioxidants 2018; 7: 98. [DOI:10.3390/antiox7080098]
12. Chegini N, Rossi M J, Masterson B J. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and EGF and PDGF beta-receptors in human endometrial tissue: localization and in vitro action. Endocrinology 1992; 130: 2373-2385. [DOI:10.1210/endo.130.4.1312455]
13. Chiu Y-H, Lu Y-C, Ou C-C, Lin S-L, Tsai C-C, Huang C-T, Lin M-Y. Lactobacillus plantarum MYL26 induces endotoxin tolerance phenotype in Caco-2 cells. BMC microbiology 2013; 13: 1-9. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2180-13-190]
14. Cody W L, Wilson J W, Hendrixson D R, McIver K S, Hagman K E, Ott C, et al. Skim milk enhances the preservation of thawed− 80 C bacterial stocks. Journal of microbiological methods 2008; 75: 135-138. [DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2008.05.006]
15. Dehkohneh A, Jafari P, Fahimi H. Effects of probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei TD3 on moderation of cholesterol biosynthesis pathway in rats. Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2019; 22: 1004.
16. Dizman N, Hsu J, Bergerot P G, Gillece J D, Folkerts M, Reining L, et al. Randomized trial assessing impact of probiotic supplementation on gut microbiome and clinical outcome from targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer medicine 2021; 10: 79-86. [DOI:10.1002/cam4.3569]
17. Efron P A, Moldawer L L. Cytokines and wound healing: the role of cytokine and anticytokine therapy in the repair response. Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation 2004; 25: 149-160. [DOI:10.1097/01.BCR.0000111766.97335.34]
18. Grazul-Bilska A T, Johnson M L, Bilski J J, Redmer D A, Reynolds L P, Abdullah A, Abdullah K M. Wound healing: the role of growth factors. Drugs Today (Barc) 2003; 39: 787-800. [DOI:10.1358/dot.2003.39.10.799472]
19. Halper J, Leshin L, Lewis S, Li W. Wound healing and angiogenic properties of supernatants from Lactobacillus cultures. Experimental Biology and Medicine 2003; 228: 1329-1337. [DOI:10.1177/153537020322801111]
20. Hunt R H. Treatment of peptic ulcer disease with sucralfate: A review. The American journal of medicine 1991; 91: S102-S106. [DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(91)90459-B]
21. Jamaran S, Jafari P, Marjani A, Akbari N, Feizabad M M. Novel wound dressing based on postbiotic/chitosan film accelerates cutaneous wound healing. Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology 2021; 14. [DOI:10.5812/jjm.120806]
22. Kamran S. Evaluation of wound healing potential, antioxidant activity, acute toxicity and gastroprotective effect of 2-pentadecanone in ethanol induced gastric mucosal ulceration in rats. Journal 2020. [DOI:10.3923/ijp.2019.944.952]
23. Kapoor R, Kakkar P. Protective role of morin, a flavonoid, against high glucose induced oxidative stress mediated apoptosis in primary rat hepatocytes. 2012. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0041663]
24. Kianmehr M, Rezaei A, Boskabady M H. Effect of carvacrol on various cytokines genes expression in splenocytes of asthmatic mice. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences 2016; 19: 402.
25. Konturek S, Brzozowski T, Drozdowicz D, Nauert C. Gastroprotection by an aluminium-and magnesium hydroxide-containing antacid in rats. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 1989; 24: 1113-1120. [DOI:10.3109/00365528909089264]
26. Lu W, Li B, Chen J, Su Y, Dong X, Su X, Gao L. Expression of calcitonin gene‑related peptide, adenosine A2a receptor and adenosine A1 receptor in experiment rat migraine models. Biomedical Reports 2016; 4: 379-383. [DOI:10.3892/br.2016.591]
27. Nagaoka M, Hashimoto S, Watanabe T, Yokokura T, Mori Y. Anti-ulcer effects of lactic acid bacteria and their cell wall polysaccharides. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1994; 17: 1012-1017. [DOI:10.1248/bpb.17.1012]
28. Noureen S, Riaz A, Arshad M, Arshad N. In vitro selection and in vivo confirmation of the antioxidant ability of Lactobacillus brevis MG 000874. Journal of applied microbiology 2019; 126: 1221-1232. [DOI:10.1111/jam.14189]
29. Ritz M-F, Graumann U, Gutierrez B, Hausmann O. Traumatic spinal cord injury alters angiogenic factors and TGF-beta1 that may affect vascular recovery. Current neurovascular research 2010; 7: 301-310. [DOI:10.2174/156720210793180756]
30. Saadatzadeh A, Fazeli M R, Jamalifar H, Dinarvand R. Probiotic properties of lyophilized cell free extract of Lactobacillus casei. Jundishapur journal of natural pharmaceutical products 2013; 8: 131. [DOI:10.17795/jjnpp-8564]
31. Sadeghi A, Ebrahimi M, Kharazmi M S, Jafari S M. Effects of microbial-derived biotics (meta/pharma/post-biotics) on the modulation of gut microbiome and metabolome; general aspects and emerging trends. Food Chemistry 2023; 411: 135478. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135478]
32. Schepp W, Classen M. Omeprazole in the acute treatment of gastric ulcer. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1989; 24: 58-62. [DOI:10.3109/00365528909091246]
33. Shenderov B A, Sinitsa A V, Zakharchenko M, Lang C. Metabiotics: Springer, 2020. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-34167-1]
34. Sistani Karampour N, Arzi A, Rezaie A, Pashmforoosh M, Kordi F. Gastroprotective effect of zingerone on ethanol-induced gastric ulcers in rats. Medicina 2019; 55: 64. [DOI:10.3390/medicina55030064]
35. Slaoui M, Bauchet A-L, Fiette L. Tissue sampling and processing for histopathology evaluation. Drug Safety Evaluation: Methods and Protocols 2017: 101-114. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-7172-5_4]
36. Süle J, Kõrösi T, Hucker A, Varga L. Evaluation of culture media for selective enumeration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria. Brazilian journal of Microbiology 2014; 45: 1023-1030. [DOI:10.1590/S1517-83822014000300035]
37. Tabatabaee Bafroee A S, Khalili Hadad B. Evaluating the effect of supernatant collected from the culture of bifidobacterium bifidum on the increase of angiogenesis in acute wound healing. Iranian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2021; 15: 552-568. [DOI:10.30699/ijmm.15.5.552]
38. Tarapatzi G, Filidou E, Kandilogiannakis L, Spathakis M, Gaitanidou M, Arvanitidis K, et al. The probiotic strains bifid οbacterium lactis, lactobacillus acidophilus, lactiplantibacillus plantarum and saccharomyces boulardii regulate wound healing and chemokine responses in human intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15: 1293. [DOI:10.3390/ph15101293]
39. Vaidyanathan L. Growth factors in wound healing-a review. Biomed. Pharmacol. J 2021; 14: 1469-1481. [DOI:10.13005/bpj/2249]
40. Virchenko O, Falalyeyeva T, Beregova T, Spivak M, Lazarenko L, Demchenko O. Effects of mono-, poly-and composite probiotics on the ulceration caused by restraint stress. Fiziolohichnyi Zhurnal (Kiev, Ukraine: 1994) 2015; 61: 35-41. [DOI:10.15407/fz61.01.035]
41. Wang C-Y, Yang C-C, Hsiao L-D, Yang C-M. Involvement of FoxO1, Sp1, and Nrf2 in upregulation of negative regulator of ROS by 15d-PGJ 2 attenuates H 2 O 2-induced IL-6 expression in rat brain astrocytes. Neurotoxicity Research 2022: 1-19. [DOI:10.1007/s12640-020-00318-6]
42. Wang Y, Fang Z, Zhai Q, Cui S, Zhao J, Zhang H, et al. Supernatants of Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus plantarum strains exhibited antioxidative effects on A7R5 cells. Microorganisms 2021; 9: 452. [DOI:10.3390/microorganisms9020452]
43. Wang Y, Liu Y, Sidhu A, Ma Z, McClain C, Feng W. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG culture supernatant ameliorates acute alcohol-induced intestinal permeability and liver injury. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 2012; 303: G32-G41. [DOI:10.1152/ajpgi.00024.2012]
44. Wattamwar P P, Dziubla T D. Modulation of the wound healing response through oxidation active materials. Engineering Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine: Novel Technologies for Clinical Applications 2012: 161-192. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-1080-5_7]
45. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiological reviews 2003; 83: 835-870. [DOI:10.1152/physrev.2003.83.3.835]
46. Wong M L, Medrano J F. Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Biotechniques 2005; 39: 75-85. [DOI:10.2144/05391RV01]
47. Xing J, Wang G, Zhang Q, Liu X, Gu Z, Zhang H, et al. Determining antioxidant activities of lactobacilli cell-free supernatants by cellular antioxidant assay: a comparison with traditional methods. PloS one 2015; 10: e0119058. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0119058]
48. Yang R, Zhao X, Wu W, Shi J. Potential of probiotics for use as functional foods in patients with non-infectious gastric ulcer. Trends in Food Science & Technology 2021. [DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.070]
49. Zhang S, Xue J, Zheng J, Wang S, Zhou J, Jiao Y, et al. The superoxide dismutase 1 3′ UTR maintains high expression of the SOD1 gene in cancer cells: The involvement of the RNA-binding protein AUF-1. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 2015; 85: 33-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.04.012]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.